In Review: Languages, Myths And History

Languages, Myths and History: An Introduction to the Linguistic and Literary Background of J.R.R. Tolkien’s Fiction by Elizabeth Solopova is a fascinating little book and a quick read (a rare and sometimes welcome occurrence for me).  However, it is exactly what it is stated to be, an introduction.  At little more than eighty pages, it is barely able to scratch the surface of the topic of Tolkien’s linguistic and mythical sources of inspiration.  The other potential problem I found is that it appears to be written under the assumption that the reader already is greatly familiar with Tolkien’s education, life and work in the subject.  This did not cause any problems for me, but would be an issue for someone newer to Tolkien scholarship/analysis outside his own writings.

Solopova introduces the topic with a discussion largely pulled from ‘On Faerie Stories,’ ‘Beowulf: The Monsters and the Critics,’ and ‘A Secret Vice,’ all off which reveal the great importance language and myth and their symbiotic relationship had in Tolkien’s professional and literary work.  The book is an overview of both the languages and myths that Tolkien would have been familiar with, as well as works he studied and possibly drew from.  Languages include: Old Norse, Old English, Finnish and Gothic.

Overall the book is a solid introduction, and makes me eager to get my hands on a copy of Solopova and Stuart Lee’s book The Keys of Middle-Earth: Discovering Medieval Literature through the Fiction of JRR Tolkien.

As I have been discussing the nature of language, myth, and names quite a bit lately, Solopova’s sub-chapter on Stories and Names, in the Old Norse chapter, particularly struck me.  Both in Old Norse sagas, and subsequently Tolkien’s works, there are a proliferation of names are used, which do not always serve any practical purpose.

“[The] use of place names in sagas reflects their borderline position between fiction, which involves conscious invention and the use of names as a literary device, and a historical narrative.” (Solopova 22)

Both in Old Norse and Old English literature, elements of real historical places and people were mentioned or listed, giving the piece(s) a sense of a true history and scope.  This is why there is some confusion, as stated by Tolkien in his lecture “Beowulf,” about how to approach these works.  They are not quite fiction, and not quite historical chronicle.  They are somewhere in between.

This layering of information, even if not evidently part of the plot, is what helps to lend depth to these tales.  It is a method Tolkien would use often in LotR, in a system Tom Shippey calls “interlacement.”  Brief mentions of tales from the Silmarillion, or cities on the map of Middle Earth, all help build a concrete conception of Middle-Earth.  It becomes a living breathing place, set in a deep and rich history.

Solopova makes another observation of note with regards to the nature of names.  They can be considered their own “lexical group.” (Solopova 22)  Names today have little meaning in everyday use, but at one point they were carefully crafted and quite descriptive of the named person, object or place.  Take for example the common surnames linked with professions such as Cooper or names based on patrimony as in Johnson.  Very little of this quality of names remains in today’s culture.

Tolkien developed his names with great care, following this archaic pattern, and creating his own “language of names” so to speak.  Solopova lists a few:

“River Running, Mysty Mountains…Legolas (‘Green Leaves’ in Sinadarin), Théoden (‘Lord’ in Old English)…Aragorn (‘Royal Tree’)…also known as Elessar (‘Elfstone), Strider, Isildur’s Heir, Longshanks and Wing-foot.” (Solopova 21)

Another possible reason for naming also drawn from Old Norse is the poetic list of names known as a ‘thulur,’ which may have had “a mnemonic function, helping poets and audiences to remember” the tales associated with them. (Solopova 23)  Again, this lends itself to the argument of interlacement.  However, in some cases it is believed the name listing is nothing more than a poetic device, as in the example Solopova gives in Widsith.

I think ultimately the argument could go either way for Tolkien’s works.  The names of the primary characters serve a secondary purpose.  To borrow from opera terminology, they function as a sort of leitmotiv, layering further information unseen or untold.  Yet at the same time, they also function as an aesthetic device: an “art-lang” of a different form by which Tolkien can create a phonetic aesthetic for Middle-Earth.

All in all, Languages, Myths and History makes for a quick and stimulating read, with plenty of ideas and source material to whet your appetite for such things.  The main criticism I have is that it is solely an introduction, so that most of the arguments are only named and not fully developed.  I guess that just means I’ll have to go find her other book!


3 thoughts on “In Review: Languages, Myths And History

  1. Yes, these works are “inside information”, that’s why they’re neither fiction nor history, but somewhere inbetween (involving a more multidimensional approach). This is how it worked for the peoples living in the days of that Tower (if you visit the British Museum, you find a tablet with nothing but Akkadian name translations)… their names meant something, they could be translated between languages, and a “famous” person (god or goddess) was known by many names as a result. These “clues” present in the names hinted at other things because the “program” for that incarnated person, as it were, was not so limited to “work, family and vacation” but it involved Cosmic Travel. And it is the same in our days, even if we don’t look at it actively – the clues are still there waiting to be discovered. It’s a matter of energetic activation. In politics this is more easily discovered (and can be quite humorous – for example in my country, a man’s surname translated as “Soup” and the country was famished, another man was called “the Cattle Driver” and people were being fooled to their faces by shady businesses), but ultimately it’s the personal realities that matter more to the individual.

  2. Just an extra hint, as it’s what I’m studying at the moment: see Snow White & The Huntsman: “Royal Tree” refers to the (White) Milky Way Galaxy, the spiritual origin of the Atlantean Kings and their connection via the Vortex on top of the head (crown) to the Cosmic reality (where all those “good and evil” teachings derive from – but I find it a very racist business on the whole: Dragons are not all evil, it’s a preconception, and I sense that the stories Tolkien wrote are much deeper & ancient than the simplistic segregation into Team Light and Team Dark; even though he himself was bound up with that segregation, post-Atlantean fall. Before that fall, religion was quite different if it existed at all, there are hints about this everywhere. Duality itself is of the ego-mind, and representative of an Energy Blockage like the Ring – i.e. post loss of “Fun” that people were having, and into worries which Heaven they’re gonna be allowed into… Just like Anakin, Frodo crosses this boundary between dark and light and manages to reestablish the balance – also Ar-Pharazon is still recognized as “okay” and has this sexy monument dedicated to him… black, shimmering in the night with hidden light for all to see… it’s extraordinary. Melissa R. Arul wrote a really expanded argument of what I’m saying here, called “Elvish Identity”. I highly rec it, if you can find it published – it’s part of her thesis in social studies so it wasn’t finished when I went to the lecture).

    • Oh, by the way – one of Aragorn’s symbols is the Ring of Barahir, which has serpents on it (or one serpent). Obviously this is used in the old sense of “healer” (the energy which rises up and connects all the separate parts of the Self), which is what Aragorn does (hands of the King, etc). When this healing happens for real and you experience it, the whole set-up of dark and light changes because it’s just not possible to see it the same way. We “learn” of good and evil by experience, which should ring a bell, but it usually doesn’t and people spend their entire lifetimes trying to convince others that their experience is the only thing that exists. In truth there are many Frequencies of existence, and harmonic resonances vs. clashes (the typical “fear of spiders” – or of Dragons…). And the earliest stories by Tolkien suggest that Dark isn’t evil (for instance, Irmo Lorien uses it to cradle the Visions & Dreams he creates), it was just used by evil minds because it suited their purposes at the time. Likewise, Light can also be used in evil ways, to hurt, scorch, hide or deceive.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s